Critical investigation, however, reveals that Brown has simply accepted a tendentious and unsupportable version of history put together by nonscholars. The New York Daily News, for example, described Brown’s research as impeccable. Many readers and reviewers of The Da Vinci Code unfortunately have reached the conclusion that Brown is presenting sound research. Brown himself has said after a year and a half of research, he became a believer in the thesis that Mary Magdalene’s role in the church was purposefully obscured, as was her marriage to Jesus. All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel, the preface states, are accurate. Though marketed as fiction, The Da Vinci Code is clearly intended to present what Brown believes is factual material about the origins of the Christian church. Brown’s fast-paced novel thereby ends with a disappointing crash into a concrete wall it promises the uncovering of secrets but never follows through. In the end, however, though the tomb is located, it remains unopened, and the documents remain concealed. ![]() The two protagonists travel from place to place while solving puzzles left behind by the curator, which lead them to the location of Mary’s tomb. Much of the novel focuses on symbologist Robert Langdon and cryptographer Sophie Neveu. The Priory (monastery) has kept the documents concealed under the pretense that the world as a whole is not ready for the startling revelations contained in them. Playing the background heroic role is a secretive group called The Priory of Sion, of whom the murdered curator was a leader and Leonardo da Vinci a past leader. The Roman Catholic Church is cast in the role of the primary arch-villain that seeks to suppress these documents and keep them hidden. The latter is alleged to have been the wife of Jesus and the true heiress to the reins of the Christian church, whose intent was to establish a feminist-centered nature religion. ![]() The story begins with the murder of a French museum curator, who was the guardian of a secret cache of documents held in the tomb of Mary Magdalene. The Da Vinci Code is best described as a historical/ technological fiction thriller, the sort of energetic composition that makes for excellent reading on a summer vacation but does not satisfy those seeking in-depth plot and character development. Ironically, were the book about any other subject, it is unlikely that it would have become a bestseller on the basis of academic merit and certainly would not have become one on the basis of literary merit. In addition, Sony Pictures has acquired the rights to the book and has recruited director Ron Howard to work on the film. The Da Vinci Code is merely resurrecting in vain a thesis that serious scholars have condemned and buried decades ago.ĭespite being merely a rehash of a discredited thesis, The Da Vinci Code has stayed atop the New York Times bestseller list for months. Theories like this, moreover, are promulgated not in peer-reviewed scholarly journals but in popular presses in which the exercise of critical faculties is optional. Nothing in scholarship or evidence to date has changed to supplant this dismissive evaluation. Religious scholars completely ignored or dismissed this theory because they had little patience for the claims of documents and societies that supposedly possessed “secret” knowledge that the academic world had missed for centuries. 1 At that time, one theory purported that the “Holy Grail” was not the cup used by Jesus Christ at the last supper instead, it was a royal bloodline fostered by Jesus’ marriage to Mary Magdalene. The premise that underlies the story in Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code last appeared in a book titled Holy Blood, Holy Grail (Delacorte Press, 1982). Every few years a popular conspiracy theory about the origins of Christianity reemerges once everyone has forgotten how it was refuted the last time it appeared.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |